{"id":5849,"date":"2025-11-04T11:25:00","date_gmt":"2025-11-04T10:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/simherd.com\/?p=5849"},"modified":"2025-11-04T12:43:00","modified_gmt":"2025-11-04T11:43:00","slug":"fremtidens-maelkeproduktion-bedre-holdbarhed-gavner-klimaet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/simherd.com\/en\/fremtidens-maelkeproduktion-bedre-holdbarhed-gavner-klimaet\/","title":{"rendered":"The Future of Dairy Production: Improved Cow Longevity Benefits the Climate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n\n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n

With climate and animal welfare high on the agenda, the dairy farms of the future face an important task: making cows live and produce for longer. But how much difference does this actually make to a herd\u2019s methane emissions?<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n

Improved Longevity and Maximized Use of Sexed and Beef Semen<\/h4>\n

In this SimHerd analysis, we explore how improved longevity can benefit both the bottom line and the climate. The starting point is a conventional herd of 250 cows (large breed) with average production and longevity levels. The herd (baseline scenario) uses 60% and 16% sexed semen on heifers and cows, respectively, and 37% beef semen on cows.<\/p>\n

In the future scenario (after 10 years), we examine the effects of improving longevity through better reproduction, fewer diseases, and lower mortality among calves and cows. At the same time, we maximize the use of sexed and beef semen\u2014completely eliminating the use of conventional semen.<\/p>\n

Table 1 shows the technical differences between the baseline and the longevity scenarios, both with and without increased use of sexed and beef semen.<\/p>\n

Table 1. Technical differences and changes in gross margin per cow-year and methane emissions between the average herd (Baseline) and scenarios where longevity is improved across all parameters, with and without maximized use of beef semen (BS). The calculations are based on 250 cow-years.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Today<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Improved longevity<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Improved longevity <\/strong><\/p>\n

+ max sexed and beef semen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Kg fat + protein\/cow-year<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

831<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

860<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

858<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Replacement rate, %<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

35<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

No. young stock<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

241<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

251<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

178<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Disease treatments per 100 cows<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

82<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

41<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

41<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Cow mortality, %<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Calf mortality, %<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Age at first calving, months<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Reproduction efficiency<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.29<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.29<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

GM\/cow-year<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19,804 DKK<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22,236 DKK<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22,260 DKK<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Methane\/kg fat+protein (different from today)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-2.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-5.3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n\n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n